Image caption If Prince William and Kate had a daughter first, she would take precedence over younger brothers Sons and daughters of any future UK monarch will have equal right to the throne, after Commonwealth leaders agreed to change succession laws. The leaders of the 16 Commonwealth countries where the Queen is head of state unanimously approved the changes at a summit in Perth, Australia. It means a first-born daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge would take precedence over younger brothers. The ban on the monarch being married to a Roman Catholic was also lifted. Under the old succession laws, dating back more than 300 years, the heir to the throne is the first-born son of the monarch. Only when there are no sons, as in the case of the Queen's father George VI, does the crown pass to the eldest daughter. By Duncan Kennedy BBC News, Perth Equal rights for women in the British Monarchy?

Prezentaciya.3dn.ru receives less than 2.44% of its total traffic. All this time it was owned by Compubyte Limited, it was hosted by Compubyte Limited. Lodochnie motori b u na avito ru. Prezentaciya.3dn has the lowest Google pagerank and bad results in terms of Yandex topical citation index. HB Practicus DN 8 HB PRACTICUS DN 6, 8, 10 machines of own production, made for composition of Brinox hose Φ 6mm, 8mm, 10mm. From length of 10 cm and up to 1, 2, 3 meters or more.

It's quite a change. The new rules will reverse 300 years of tradition, custom and law, so it's a big royal deal. There have been at least 11 attempts to change the passage of succession down the years, but they've never got anywhere. Now, with the arrival of Kate and William on the public stage, a sense of urgency has overtaken the drag of inertia. The leaders of the Commonwealth have, like David Cameron, recognised this and so decided to act, using Perth to give birth to these royal reforms. The other modification, allowing future monarchs to marry Catholics, is just as radical, removing an anti-Catholic bias at the heart of the monarchy.

Will these changes make a difference? Potentially, yes, particularly the daughter/son succession one, especially if William and Kate's first-born is a girl. She could become queen and thereby alter the course of British history. Announcing the succession changes, Prime Minister David Cameron said they would apply to descendents of the Prince of Wales. They will not be applied retrospectively.

'Put simply, if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were to have a little girl, that girl would one day be our queen,' he said. 'The idea that a younger son should become monarch instead of an elder daughter simply because he is a man, or that a future monarch can marry someone of any faith except a Catholic - this way of thinking is at odds with the modern countries that we have become.' Australia's Prime Minister Julia Gillard said it was an extraordinary moment: 'I'm very enthusiastic about it. You would expect the first Australian woman prime minister to be very enthusiastic about a change which equals equality for women in a new area.' She said the changes appeared to be straightforward. 'But just because they seem straightforward to our modern minds doesn't mean that we should underestimate their historical significance, changing as they will for all time the way in which the monarchy works and changing its history.' But the campaign group Republic - which wants an elected head of state in Britain - said 'nothing of substance' had been changed.